Given the decision of the Board of the Regional Electoral Tribunal of the Judiciary of the Federation on the allocation of deputies by the principle of proportional representation, an appeal for reconsideration of you know that the Upper Chamber court.
New Partnership
exhausted legal means to safeguard their rights Source: elmatutinovirtual
In plenary session held on October 18 present, members of the Board judges Xalapa Regional Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Review Judgement resolved identified the key Constitutional SX-JRC-135/2010 and accumulated on the Court of Judicial Elections Veracruz State which confirms the assignment of deputies by the principle of proportional representation by the Electoral Institute of Veracruz in the election of deputies to the State Congress in the elections 2009-2010.
New Partnership
exhausted legal means to safeguard their rights Source: elmatutinovirtual
In plenary session held on October 18 present, members of the Board judges Xalapa Regional Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial Review Judgement resolved identified the key Constitutional SX-JRC-135/2010 and accumulated on the Court of Judicial Elections Veracruz State which confirms the assignment of deputies by the principle of proportional representation by the Electoral Institute of Veracruz in the election of deputies to the State Congress in the elections 2009-2010.
reference resolution confirming the substance of the assignment of representatives made by the General Council of the State Electoral Institute, assigning the PRI 4 councils that did not correspond and leaving New Alliance Party assigned to a deputation by proportional representation.
of the decision by the Regional Board warns:
1) Declare founded the grievances raised by New Alliance and other parties, and fully resolves the question of jurisdiction was raised (substantially what to intrepretación understood by the majority party);
2) The Regional Board concluded that the majority party should be considering in the form only to the person who earned 25 wins simple majority, which is considered devoid of justification and violates the legal order in response to:
a) The Supreme Court of Justice's Office decided that the term "majority party" as defined in Veracruz electoral law must be commensurate with the systematic interpretation of the rules that govern the procedure for allocation of provincial, therefore, the Supreme Court's Office found that the majority party should be seen as the one who has obtained the greatest number of votes, however, that the above criteria is a statutory provision as mandatory enforcement, the judges of the Regional Board "issued a new interpretation" is based on criteria similar to the one passed by the Interpreting made by the Supreme Court of the Nation, that is, the Regional Board determined that the majority party was the one who got 25 members.
b) Similarly we see that the interpretation formualda by the Regional Board was a "free interpretation" since it was made without there being an injury in that sense, that is, neither party raised elements that applicants allowed to reach the stage reached by the judges of the Chamber, which is why it acted in excess of its legal powers to consider matters extraneous to the suit in question.
c) Under the above and whenever it is expedient route to appear before the Regional Chamber itself with an appeal for reconsideration of that know the Superior Electoral Court of the Judiciary of the Federation, the New Alliance Party will use up the roads and procedural steps to safeguard their right to have a deputy of proportional representation in the Congress LXII Legislature of the State of Veracruz.
of the decision by the Regional Board warns:
1) Declare founded the grievances raised by New Alliance and other parties, and fully resolves the question of jurisdiction was raised (substantially what to intrepretación understood by the majority party);
2) The Regional Board concluded that the majority party should be considering in the form only to the person who earned 25 wins simple majority, which is considered devoid of justification and violates the legal order in response to:
a) The Supreme Court of Justice's Office decided that the term "majority party" as defined in Veracruz electoral law must be commensurate with the systematic interpretation of the rules that govern the procedure for allocation of provincial, therefore, the Supreme Court's Office found that the majority party should be seen as the one who has obtained the greatest number of votes, however, that the above criteria is a statutory provision as mandatory enforcement, the judges of the Regional Board "issued a new interpretation" is based on criteria similar to the one passed by the Interpreting made by the Supreme Court of the Nation, that is, the Regional Board determined that the majority party was the one who got 25 members.
b) Similarly we see that the interpretation formualda by the Regional Board was a "free interpretation" since it was made without there being an injury in that sense, that is, neither party raised elements that applicants allowed to reach the stage reached by the judges of the Chamber, which is why it acted in excess of its legal powers to consider matters extraneous to the suit in question.
c) Under the above and whenever it is expedient route to appear before the Regional Chamber itself with an appeal for reconsideration of that know the Superior Electoral Court of the Judiciary of the Federation, the New Alliance Party will use up the roads and procedural steps to safeguard their right to have a deputy of proportional representation in the Congress LXII Legislature of the State of Veracruz.
0 comments:
Post a Comment