Deputies PT amend the plan to the court, not cut Calderón in the utmost secrecy, the Supreme Court ruled on June 9 and 10 reduce the amount minisalarios. The decision affected a million 200 thousand workers would decrease their pensions. Full unanimously approved by law to stay top 25 minimum wages. newspaper La Jornada
Wednesday October 13, 2010, p. 11 The full House of Representatives yesterday unanimously approved an amendment to Article 25 Transitional Social Security Act, with so that the upper limit of pensions Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS) is not reduced to 10 minimum wages, but remain on top of 25 months.
a result, the Chamber of Deputies amended the verdict in a private meeting on June 9, issued by the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SNA), in which affected one million 200 000 workers.
On 22 July, this newspaper reported that the decision as quietly took the Supreme Court to tax the highest pensions in 10 minimum wage, which was a blow to future retirees whose salaries are located at the limit of 25 months' pension, and that this would decrease their retirement income.
In June, the second chamber of the Court approved unanimously by the five members of the thesis presented by the rapporteur Sergio Valls minister who was legal director of the IMSS, which quantified the invalidity pension, old age and unemployment in older workers to a maximum of 10 times the general minimum wage in the Federal District, wipe out the 25 months set forth in the Social Security Act.
Thus, if a worker had contributed 2000 weeks of continuous work during their working life, and the time of retirement held a monthly income above 25 minimum wages, equal to about 42 thousand dollars, would only receive 17 thousand.
Yesterday, by 354 votes in favor and none against, the House approved the addition of a third paragraph to Article 25 transitional IMSS Law, which defines the scope of disability insurance and life, as well as branches of unemployment in old age and old age:
same limit (25) times the minimum wage will be the amount in excess of the amounts of pensions for those insured registered prior to the date of entry into force of this Act, and their beneficiaries who, upon completion of legal cases or incident corresponding to the enjoyment of any pension, opt to receive the benefits of repealing the law.
explaining the opinion of a PRD initiative to correct the ruling of the Court, the president of the Social Security Commission, Uriel Lopez, said that the House took a decision to give legal certainty workers and prevent a change IMSS in the direction of slashing the amount of pensions.
He said that the amendment to the Law of the IMSS, which bases pensions on a system of individual accounts state that at the beginning of his term the maximum employer-employee contribution would be the amount equivalent to 15 times the minimum wage in the Federal District, which would increase in the minimum wage each year until in 2007 to 25 minimum wages.
However, he said, the law left a loophole that allowed the Court limit the amount of pensions, to resolve the contradiction 143/2010 thesis, supported by the thirteenth and twelfth collegiate courts, both in terms of work.
In its ruling, the Court determined that "disability insurance, old age, unemployment in old age and death (...) have an upper limit corresponding to 10 times the minimum wage, the understanding that this limit applies to general health insurance and maternity.
To prevent this from happening in the future, this opinion balance is restored in the provisions of law, the legislator said PRD.
When added to the definition of reform, Rep. Raul Cuadra Garcia (PAN) lamented the legal uncertainty that was left to the IMSS insured with the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court.
The PAN is the right of workers to better performance, to enjoy decent and fair pension after many years of work, he said.
End the uncertainty
with telephone leader and member of the PRD, Francisco Hernandez Juarez, stressed that the decision of the ministers against pensions generated a scenario of uncertainty for workers who, after pension contributions for up to 25 minimum wages, "they wanted to gracefully change this situation and limit it to only 10.
The reaction was generated in the country was such that Social Security should seriously consider keeping (the ceiling of 25 months), but what was decisive was the position of the House Deputies, except that leaves any interpretation of the law, said the legislator.
0 comments:
Post a Comment