Daniel Ruiz said his work so far has a rating of 9.6, because only they have withdrawn four determinations of more than 400 resolutions that have ruled. Writer
Iratze Osorio / ElGolfo.Info
Iratze Osorio / ElGolfo.Info
"Maybe we're not good for mathematics "was the reply of the presiding judge of the Electoral Tribunal of State of Veracruz, Daniel Ruiz Morales, after members of the Board's Regional Electoral Tribunal of the Federal Judicial records referred to them cases of Coatzacoalcos, Poza Rica and Cordoba to count the votes in the election of mayors.
Interviewed at the end of the session that resolved lawsuits to protect citizens' rights and recourses of disagreement over the allocation of council areas, the lawyer said his work so far has rated 9.6, because only they have withdrawn four determinations of more than 400 resolutions that have ruled after the local election.
"It Córdoba, and Coatzacoalcos, Poza Rica and then to what we are seeing is that votes do count, not that the accounts do not go ... maybe we are not good for mathematics but we established is that it was not necessary after the mistakes we see in each box, also did not give results that would affect the vote. "
The lawyer said that the corrections have been made federal judges to work are subjective and interpretation, which ultimately affect the fact that the position of the members of the Regional Court is a judicial body than Teevan.
"That they are in a position superior to ours and we have to comply with what they determine that is the only difference."
And this Friday the Regional Court of the Court Election of the Judiciary of the Federation decided, unanimously, to refer to local authority records of cases of Poza Rica, Córdoba and Coatzacoalcos to be posted again the votes cast on July 4, since the result was canceled after a few boxes was counted wrong.
should be noted that the time of the rating the gubernatorial local magistrates issued a rat faith to correct the total votes cast and the allocation to each coalitions, since they will be as valid votes in favor of a party which did not correspond.
Questioned by the above, the lawyer said, "is that we have not counted the votes, so we established here is that we were giving votes to a party that did not correspond, but incurring a situation of this nature and amend it and recognize it in time, I think that instead of speaking ill of the Court speaks well of the institution. "
Ruiz Morales insisted that no tries to minimize the revocations that have been submitted, then, "he said, are minimal in relation to total resources and judgments of protecting the rights of citizens have been revised.
0 comments:
Post a Comment